A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has given that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute within the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't alter the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside together with one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.