A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of founded people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic from the depth with the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence in the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Unique Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Irrespective of whether it'll in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.