A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours over the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction will work at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, find to construct their family dwelling. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. Based on the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result spots are subject to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the proper situation. Their lawful staff has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their look at, an allegation that has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are both really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular attempts by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, a picture which has considering the fact that turn into emblematic of the depth of your dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they ended up intended to Get visual proof of your wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Occasions reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the positioning became Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely observed that such steps were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial minute from the authorized timeline.
With René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times the core of the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes past what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and problems connected on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is inspired by worry for environmental security and adherence to planning legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting as an alternative that it's about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've described their long-standing link to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few just attempting to produce a family members home in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Specific Place of Conservation and say that all is effective happen to be carried out dependant on Experienced tips and authorised options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea through a storm, never alter the underlying information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier noted which the businessman experienced Beforehand been associated with regional advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from quite distinctive Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded through midsection-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical truth on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal technique.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains unsure. The court will have to establish whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and scheduling problems. Yet the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who need to Are living together with one another prolonged after the legal expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation extend past that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems which include environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre with the dispute stands partially designed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the end be altered, taken off, or finished as planned will rely on the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely carry on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to One of the more closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.