A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted beneath setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations, an image which includes considering that turn into emblematic from the depth from the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they were being intended to Acquire visual evidence in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Times noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water in the course of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely observed that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment inside the legal timeline.
On the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of planning paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting rather that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their long-standing link to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few only wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Particular Space of Conservation and say that all functions happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted options. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly widespread. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation among personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient continues to Rene Collier and Paul Feely be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.